contextual fear conditioning chamber Search Results


97
Med Associates Inc contextual fear conditioning
Contextual Fear Conditioning, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual fear conditioning/product/Med Associates Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
AutoMate Scientific Inc shuttle box
Shuttle Box, supplied by AutoMate Scientific Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/shuttle box/product/AutoMate Scientific Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
shuttle box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Med Associates Inc standard mouse fear conditioning chamber
Standard Mouse Fear Conditioning Chamber, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard mouse fear conditioning chamber/product/Med Associates Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard mouse fear conditioning chamber - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
UGO Basile S.R.L contextual conditioning
( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual <t>conditioning</t> by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.
Contextual Conditioning, supplied by UGO Basile S.R.L, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual conditioning/product/UGO Basile S.R.L
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Coulbourn Instruments standard operant chambers
( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual <t>conditioning</t> by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.
Standard Operant Chambers, supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard operant chambers/product/Coulbourn Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard operant chambers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Rocha labs impaired contextual fear conditioning
( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual <t>conditioning</t> by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.
Impaired Contextual Fear Conditioning, supplied by Rocha labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/impaired contextual fear conditioning/product/Rocha labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
impaired contextual fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Med Associates Inc contextual nir video fear conditioning system
( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual <t>conditioning</t> by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.
Contextual Nir Video Fear Conditioning System, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual nir video fear conditioning system/product/Med Associates Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual nir video fear conditioning system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cerebricon limited contextual fear conditioning
A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which <t>conditioning</t> occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.
Contextual Fear Conditioning, supplied by Cerebricon limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual fear conditioning/product/Cerebricon limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Coulbourn Instruments contextual fear-conditioning chamber
A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which <t>conditioning</t> occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.
Contextual Fear Conditioning Chamber, supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual fear-conditioning chamber/product/Coulbourn Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual fear-conditioning chamber - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Stoelting inc contextual fear conditioning
A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which <t>conditioning</t> occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.
Contextual Fear Conditioning, supplied by Stoelting inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/contextual fear conditioning/product/Stoelting inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
contextual fear conditioning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Coulbourn Instruments freeze frame
A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which <t>conditioning</t> occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.
Freeze Frame, supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/freeze frame/product/Coulbourn Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
freeze frame - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Coulbourn Instruments fear-conditioning working-station
A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which <t>conditioning</t> occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.
Fear Conditioning Working Station, supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fear-conditioning working-station/product/Coulbourn Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fear-conditioning working-station - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Impaired parvalbumin interneurons in the retrosplenial cortex as the cause of sex-dependent vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt8976

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Timeline of surgery and behavioral testing. ( B ) pAAV-s5e2-Gq-P2A-d Tomato expression (green) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (grayscale). Scale bars, 1 mm. ( C ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by male mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. ( D ) Percentage of time spent in the novel arm of the forced alternation Y-maze task by female mice with saline treatment and subsequent DCZ treatment. *P = 0.0349, a priori two-sample t test. ( E ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by male mice treated with saline or DCZ. ( F ) Activity suppression ratio following contextual conditioning by female mice treated with saline or DCZ. *P = 0.0088, a priori two-sample t test. ( G ) Photomicrographs showing s5e2 (green) and c-Fos (grayscale) staining in the RSC with saline and DCZ treatments. Scale bars, 50 μm. ( H ) Percentage of s5e2 + cells that were co-localized with c-Fos with saline and DCZ treatment. *P < 0.0001, two-sample t test. ( I ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in male WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0075, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). ( J ) c-Fos expression density in s5e2-negative cells across the RSC in female WT and 5xFAD mice treated with saline of DCZ. *P = 0.0207, two-way ANOVA (genotype × treatment). Data represent means ± SEM. Group sizes have been presented in parentheses alongside of each plot. See also fig. S6. All statistical comparisons have been provided in table S3.

Article Snippet: Contextual conditioning took place in Ugo Basile (Gemonio, Italy) contextual fear conditioning chambers (17 cm by 17 cm) placed inside of sound attenuating cabinets.

Techniques: Expressing, Saline, Activity Assay, Staining

A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which conditioning occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: SAHA Enhances Synaptic Function and Plasticity In Vitro but Has Limited Brain Availability In Vivo and Does Not Impact Cognition

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069964

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Compared to non-transgenic littermates (n = 15), Tg2576 (n = 14) mice showed significantly less freezing than wt mice when returned to the context in which conditioning occurred (context, p<0.001), when placed in an altered context (altered, p<0.01), or in response to the cue used for conditioning (cue, p<0.05). B) Tg2576 mice were treated daily for 33 days prior to, as well as during fear conditioning with either vehicle (n = 14), 25 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13), or 50 mg/kg SAHA (n = 13). There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time Tg2576 mice spent freezing in response to the context, altered context, or cue (p>0.05). C) There was no effect of treatment on the percentage of time spent freezing during conditioning (p>0.05). D) There was no effect of treatment on the distance traveled in the open field test (total distance = 38.0±7.7 m for vehicle, 39.6±6.1 m for 25 mg/kg SAHA, and 34.2±5.2 m for 50 mg/kg SAHA, p>0.05). All data are plotted as mean ±SEM.

Article Snippet: Contextual fear conditioning was performed at Cerebricon, Ltd., (Finland).

Techniques: Transgenic Assay